Showing posts with label 2017. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2017. Show all posts

Sunday, 16 July 2017

DeVry SPCH 275 All Assignments – Latest 2017



TO PURCHASE THIS CONTACT US AT 


WHISPERHILLS@GMAIL.COM

Week 1 Speech Self-Introduction Speech

 Deliver a short presentation (1 to 2 minutes) in which you introduce yourself to a group of people. Think for a short bit about what you might share with either an audience of your peers or people you might be meeting for the first time in a professional situation. Then take a look at the recording presentations guidelines to ensure that you have everything, and begin recording when you are ready. It may take you some time to get all of the logistics (e.g., adequate light, ensuring that the sound level is audible, and framing yourself), so plan to capture at least several test runs before the final recording. Though you may wish to include them, no outline or audience members are required for this presentation. This assignment will be revisited and revised in Week 7.



Week 1 Assignment
Communication Anxiety Report and Analysis
Fill out the Personal Report of Communication Anxiety, and complete the following questions:
What does your report seem to suggest about your level of communication apprehension?
 What effect do common causes of communication apprehension noted in the reading (e.g., heredity, learned apprehension, skill deficit, etc.) have on this?
What are some ways found in this week's readings and this week's discussion about managing apprehension that may help alleviate challenges or prove useful?
For each question, you should write at least 100 to 200 words in response, using correct grammar, spelling, and syntax. Please submit a copy of your report and your responses in a separate Word (.docx) file to the Dropbox. Save your files with the following naming conventions: John Gibbons SPCH 275 Week 1 PRCA and Josh Gibbons SPCH 275 Week 1 PRCA Analysis. Please note that both must be submitted in order to earn points for this assignment. Submit your assignment to the Dropbox, located at the top of this page. For instructions on how to use the Dropbox, read these step-by-step instructions. See the Syllabus section "Due Dates for Assignments & Exams" for due date information.



Week 2 Assignment
Impromptu Speaking and Self-Evaluation

Part I: Present and record a 1- to 2-minute impromptu presentation on a topic of your choice. Though you should choose something that allows you to be clear, the topic may be relatively free flowing. It may help to start with a single question. Here are sample questions that may be used to get you started with ideas: How would you spend lottery winnings? What charity or cause would you support? If you were able to travel to a time or place in history, where would you go? What is one challenge you have faced? What is your favorite book, video game, television show, or song? Where would you like to take a vacation? What is a current event that interests you? Whom do you admire? What was your most embarrassing moment? Part II: Listen and view your presentation, and write a short critique of your work. Use the following prompts to frame your critique: Write two paragraphs about what did or did not surprise you about watching the video of your presentation. Feel free to discuss the differences or similarities between your perceptions immediately after the presentation and those after watching the video. Identify both two strengths and two areas of opportunity in your public speaking skills. Submit Part II as a Word (.docx) file to the Dropbox. Save your file with the following naming convention: James Schneider SPCH 275 Week 2 Assignment.


Week 3 Speech Presentation

This week, you will deliver your Personal Attitude Speech.The details for this speech is located under Presentations Overview. You will also need to submit your outline in Word (.docx) format to the Dropbox. Save your file with the following naming convention: Teresa Hayes SPCH 275 Week 3 PA Outline.
 Personal Attitude Speech
 This is an individual speaking assignment, 5-7 minutes in length. This is a speech with the general purpose of to inform. You are required to perform the prescribed format by following outline guidelines, using a speaker outline, and executing an effective delivery. Your final outline is due the scheduled day of your presentation. A preparation outline is required to be submitted to the appropriate Dropbox for grading review. Requirements You should create a thesis statement that supports a personal belief that you have. The purpose of this assignment is for you to explain a developed idea that you have. No research is required, though a thorough explanation of reasoning behind your belief is expected. Your presentation should have a fully developed beginning, middle, and ending. Extemporaneous delivery is expected for this presentation.

Week 4 Assignment
 General Rationale
 This document contains the instructions for the Great Speeches Assignment. It is designed as a listening opportunity for one of the most influential presentations in modern history and also as an exercise to aid in developing an appreciation for the impact that language has on public speaking.
Instructions 1. Carefully listen to and view the assigned presentation for this assignment. If your professor has not provided another requirement for this assignment, locate Martin Luther King, Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech online. The entire presentation is roughly 20 minutes in length. 2. Write at least 100–200 words about the context (e.g., year, season, location, time of day, etc.), the audience (e.g., demographics, characteristics, frame of reference, etc.) and events (e.g., what happened before, what was planned to happen afterward, motivation, etc.) surrounding this presentation. 3. Write at least 100–200 words about style from the four canons of rhetoric described in Week 3. Address one or two ways in which language aids in making this presentation a success. Give examples to support your point of view. 4. Write at least 100–200 words about how you can use this example to refocus your efforts for language use in your public speaking and communication skills. Additional Expectations Use headings to identify clearly which prompt you are addressing. Write in complete sentences. Check carefully to ensure that your spelling, grammar, syntax, and overall writing style are professional or college level. This should not show sloppy writing. Save your file with the following naming convention: First Last SPCH275 Week 4 Great Speeches Assignment.



Week 6 speech Informative Speech

(due in Week 6)

This week, you will deliver your Informative Speech. Look to the detailed instructions for further guidance. You will also need to submit your outline in Word (.docx) and visual aids in PowerPoint (.pptx) formats to the Dropbox. Save your files with the following naming conventions: Carol Dietrich SPCH 275 Week 6 Outline and Jason Rose SPCH 275 Week 6 Visual Aids.

This is an individual speaking assignment, 5-7 minutes in length. This is a speech with the general purpose of to inform. You will be required to conduct research, synthesize information, and organize speaker materials. Resources should be current, credible, comprehensive, and documented both orally and in the references. The presentation will be accompanied by a visual PowerPoint presentation (or other visual aids approved by your professor). The preparation outline and the accompanying visual aids are required to be submitted to the appropriate Dropbox for grading review.
Additional Requirements The tone and messaging of the presentation should be informative and supportive of an informative speaking purpose. You should create a thesis statement that supports this. You should document at least five quality sources from the DeVry University Library in a references list, parenthetically on the outline, and orally during the presentation. Your presentation should have a fully developed beginning, middle, and ending. Extemporaneous delivery is expected for this presentation. Listen

Week 7 speech
Presentation Revised Self-Introduction Speech
Begin by reviewing your work over the session in the various speaking opportunities you have had in this course, putting particular focus on your Self-Introduction that you presented in Week 1. Then think about a professional context, such as a job fair, a work dinner, an industry conference, or a job interview—any professionally based situation in which you may need to introduce yourself to someone who does not know you. Consider the following:
 Who are you professionally?
 How will you explain that in a short amount of time?
What's a good response when someone prompts, "Tell me about yourself?"

As you consider these questions, begin to gather and rehearse ideas for an elevator pitch that introduces you to someone new. Notes or an outline are recommended but not required to be submitted. You should have an audience present for this presentation, even if the audience is not professionally connected to or well known by you. The audience-centered focus for what you say should be someone unknown. This presentation should combine all of your improvement, your professional communication, and your communicative identity into a tight elevator pitch that you may use and revise for years to come.



Week 7 Assignment Speech Criticism Assignment
 Use the template provided, in addition to the handout about the Canons of Rhetoric,
from Doc Sharing to write a critique of a presentation selected by your professor. Save your file with the following naming convention: Tara Mills SPCH275 Week 7 Speech Criticism PLEASE READ THIS FIRST PAGE CAREFULLY. IT SHOULD BE DELETED WHEN YOU SUBMIT YOUR ASSIGNMENT FOR GRADING.
General Rationale
 This document contains the instructions for the Speech Criticism Assignment. It is designed as an opportunity for you to observe and critique a presentation in a formal manner using the canons of rhetoric as a framework.
Instructions 1.
 Carefully listen to and view the assigned presentation for this assignment. Review your professor’s announcements for the specific presentation(s) for this assignment.

2. Write an introductory section that gains the audience’s attention, gives a sense of your overall impression of the presentation, and sets up the rest of your critique.

3. Write a section about the invention canon of rhetoric as related to this presentation.
4. Write a section about the arrangement canon of rhetoric as related to this presentation.
 5. Write a section about the style canon of rhetoric as related to this presentation.
 6. Write a section about the delivery canon of rhetoric as related to this presentation.
7. Write a concluding section that summarizes the major critiques of the presentation and ends comfortably.
Additional Expectations and Suggestions

 This should be three or four double-spaced pages. Use headings to identify clearly which canon through which you are evaluating. The four middle sections should be relatively equally developed. Use the Questions for Canons of Rhetoric document in Doc Sharing to generate ideas for content. You are not required to answer every question or prompt in that document. Aim to write this in third person, and use examples to support your ideas. Write in complete sentences, and use transitions to connect the sections into one coherent critique document. Check carefully to ensure that your spelling, grammar, syntax, and overall writing style are professional or college level. This should not show sloppy writing. The remainder of this document gives some general formatting that you may use. Delete this first page before submitting it to the dropbox. Save your file with the following naming convention: First Last SPCH275 Week 7 Speech Criticism Assignment. [Name] SPCH275: Public Speaking [Title of Presentation] Critique [Date] Presentation available at [URL] Introduction Invention Arrangement Style Delivery Conclusion


Sunday, 7 May 2017

DeVry ETHC 445 Week 6 Quiz Latest 2017

TO PURCHASE THIS CONTACT US AT

 

WHISPERHILLS@GMAIL.COM


Question 1. Question : Ethics of the deontological school would drive the commanding officer (CO) to make what decision? To seek the best welfare for his sailor To take risks of courage To calculate the best possible outcome To ask what virtues he seeks to honor To do his duty under rules and procedures

Question 2. Question : Which of the three primary schools of ethics is operating when the commanding officer (CO) decides for medical evacuation of the injured sailor in order to aid the most possible? Care based Ends based Virtue based Self-interest Conscience driven

Question 3. Question : If the CO’s conscience was bothering him while making a decision, reading up on what ethicist would have made him aware of his thinking and deciding? Ayn Rand St. Anselm St. Thomas Aquinas John Locke John Stuart Mill

Question 4. Question : What virtue is not shown if the CO shows unwillingness to contact the carrier air group commander about the welfare of his sailor because of fear? Procrastination Selfishness The virtue of courage Wisdom Moderation

Question 5. Question : The maxim “I uphold only the ethical view that all rational beings ought uphold” follows _____. Utilitarian ethics An Aristotelian moderation of virtue A strong application of care-based ethics Kant’s categorical imperative in the first formulation Care-based ethics

Question 6. Question : The CO’s practice of moderation in not taking excessive risks connects him with what concept of ethics? Aquinas’ concept of conscience James’ pragmatism Aquinas’ concept of natural ethics Mill’s utilitarianism Aristotle’s doctrine of the mean

Question 7. Question : To ask, “What is the best possible outcome for my whole ship” is to apply what kind of ethics? Social contract Utilitarianism Deontological ethics Being caught in a dilemma Ethics of the mean

Question 8. Question : To think, “What can this do for my reputation when I come up for selection as admiral,” is an example of what kind of ethics? Immanuel Kant’s categorical imperative. John Locke’s social contract. Ayn Rand’s objectivism. Augustine’s doctrine of sin. A social contract with the crew.

Question 9. Question : For the CO to consider what the crew as a whole would want for handling the situation involves what kind of ethics? Sphere of influence Utilitarian ethics Majority thinking The principle of equity Care-based ethics

Question 10. Question : A decision to ask the injured seaman what he wants to happen is what kind of ethics? Care-based ethics The prudent mariner approach Utilitarian ethics The ethics of self-interest The CO’s duty

DeVry ETHC 445 Week 3 Quiz Latest 2017

TO PURCHASE THIS CONTACT US AT

 

WHISPERHILLS@GMAIL.COM


1. Question

: Inductive reasoning falls into fallacy when which of the following happens? Hasty generalizations are made One tries to deduce a conclusion from false premises One has a large enough sample set of data on which to base inductions Data cannot support the claims made for the logical reasoning One tries to work out syllogisms

Question 2.

Question : A car salesman says this, in order to get you to buy a new car from him: “Buddy! You gotta buy this car. You’ve seen how you either need to drive one of these or take the bus!” This type of faulty logic is an example of _____. circumlocution the ad hominem argument hasty generalization fallacy the straw man fallacy appeal to emotions

Question 3

. Question : Do you have only a few select friends or a large circle of friends? What fallacy is operating here? Straw man Appeal to fear Ad hominem False dilemma Questionable statistics

Question 4.

Question : All those old people are cheap. They never give me a fair tip when I park their cars in the valet parking lot. What kind of fallacy is operating here? Straw man Appeal to fear Hasty generalization Questionable statistics Slippery slope

Question 5.

Question : Measuring our country’s health by measuring the consumption of petroleum is like measuring a person’s health my how much medical care he or she buys. What kind of fallacy is operating here? Hasty generalization Questionable statistics False analogy Invalid in form Confusing assumptions with facts

DeVry ETHC 445 Week 1 Quiz Latest 2017

TO PURCHASE THIS CONTACT US AT

WHISPERHILLS@GMAIL.COM


Question 1.

Question : Which of the below behaviors are inappropriate in a course? Posting a racist comment in the threads TYPING IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS IN THE THREADS Typing posts that contain poor grammar, spelling, and no punctuation, requiring others to guess at the meaning Postings such as this: “Can you use spell-check or proofread, or are you just too stupid?” All of the above

Question 2.

Question : Ethics involves issues of right and wrong, and emotionally charged issues and ideas; thus, the best way to ensure that my comments are taken in the way I mean them is to _____. generalize ideas about the racial or ethnic groups which display them consider the impact they may have on those who are different than me sit quietly in the corner of the discussions and hope that others will not ask for my input assume that other students will value what I value assume that the instructor will value everything I say or imply

Question 3.

Question : Posting in the course’s threaded discussions is an essential element in our online, asynchronous classroom. Which of the following is not an example of value-adding posting? Bringing an item that has been researched on the Internet with a quote and website link Simply bringing an opinion statement to the discussion with a phrase like, “Well, I think . . .” (Unsupported opinion) Adding wisdom to a discussion from your personal background or expertise Asking for clarification of the meaning of another student’s post Writing a response to another student’s post by name

Question 4.
Question : Which of the following is the most appropriate response for a student to post to another student who has posted this: WHAT IS WRONG WITH ALL OF YOU? YOU ARE AS STUPID AS A BOX OF ROCKS! Answer the post very directly and with capital letters for effect. Send an e-mail to that student to correct him or her. Post an equally strong rebuttal. Complain offline to your Student Advisor. Ignore this and allow your instructor to handle it – either directly with the offender or through Student Services.

Question 5.

Question : Choose from the following choices the way in which collegiality is expressed in our course. A certain tolerance for anger and expressions of it in posts Ignoring the good wisdom that students with particular knowledge bring to the discussions Behaving carefully so as to not cause offense to other students or quickly take offense at others Accusing other students of their biases and preconceptions Stating strong opinions and expecting others to follow suit